Home
Issues
Aim and Scope
Open Access
Editorial Board
Indexing
Why publish with us
Contact Us
Instructions to Authors (PDF)
Manuscript Types
Manuscript Formatting
How to submit
Preprints
Special publications & Reprints
Authorship & COI
Principles of Transparency Checklist
Data Policies
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
Fluoride-related misinformation analysis on Twitter: Infodemiology study
1
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, Canada
2
School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, India
3
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil, Brazil
Publication date: 2023-04-26
Popul. Med. 2023;5(Supplement):A591
ABSTRACT
Background & Objectives:
The presence of misinformation on social media significantly harms communities since accessing trustworthy information is a ground principle for people to achieve better health-related outcomes. In this context, antifluoridation content is broadly shared on social media, deceiving people about fluoride’s relevance and safety. Considering the potential negative implications of online fluoride falsehoods, the present study aimed to analyze fluoride-related misinformation on Twitter.
Methods:
First, 23,436 tweets were collected using the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) from the keyword “fluoride-free” between May 2016 and May 2022. After data preprocessing, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling techniques were applied with remain 21,169 tweets to determine the salient topics linked to the falsehood. Finally, time series decomposition methods were applied to define fluoride misinformation trends and seasonality over time using pandas, NumPy, and statsmodels.tsa.seasonal libraries in Python 3.
Results:
From a coherence score of 0.542, a total of 3 different salient topics emerged from the LDA topic modeling analysis. As a result, fluoride-related misinformation was mainly associated with the people’s perception of a healthy lifestyle (topic 1), followed by the consumption of natural and organic oral care products (topic 2), and recommendations of fluoride-free products and measures (topic 3). Notably, all topics displayed a decreasing trend between 2016-2019 and an increasing trend from 2020 onwards. Moreover, they presented a seasonal pattern of searches with peaks mainly at the beginning and middle of each year.
Conclusion:
Fluoride misinformation was primarily related to personal concerns about a healthier lifestyle. The recent increasing trends of falsehoods have probably contributed to the popularization of fluoride-free products and the suspension of fluoridated water community programs. Hence, user-centered digital health strategies are required to control the spread and consumption of fluoride misinformation on social media.
The presence of misinformation on social media significantly harms communities since accessing trustworthy information is a ground principle for people to achieve better health-related outcomes. In this context, antifluoridation content is broadly shared on social media, deceiving people about fluoride’s relevance and safety. Considering the potential negative implications of online fluoride falsehoods, the present study aimed to analyze fluoride-related misinformation on Twitter.
Methods:
First, 23,436 tweets were collected using the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) from the keyword “fluoride-free” between May 2016 and May 2022. After data preprocessing, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling techniques were applied with remain 21,169 tweets to determine the salient topics linked to the falsehood. Finally, time series decomposition methods were applied to define fluoride misinformation trends and seasonality over time using pandas, NumPy, and statsmodels.tsa.seasonal libraries in Python 3.
Results:
From a coherence score of 0.542, a total of 3 different salient topics emerged from the LDA topic modeling analysis. As a result, fluoride-related misinformation was mainly associated with the people’s perception of a healthy lifestyle (topic 1), followed by the consumption of natural and organic oral care products (topic 2), and recommendations of fluoride-free products and measures (topic 3). Notably, all topics displayed a decreasing trend between 2016-2019 and an increasing trend from 2020 onwards. Moreover, they presented a seasonal pattern of searches with peaks mainly at the beginning and middle of each year.
Conclusion:
Fluoride misinformation was primarily related to personal concerns about a healthier lifestyle. The recent increasing trends of falsehoods have probably contributed to the popularization of fluoride-free products and the suspension of fluoridated water community programs. Hence, user-centered digital health strategies are required to control the spread and consumption of fluoride misinformation on social media.
| ISSN: | 2654-1459 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
